Is Flexibility ImpoRtant foR Skiing?

Lone Peak Performance, Bozeman MT

Recovery Testing
October 31, 2018
the cross country skiers look like a piece of the pie is missing

By Heidi Bowman and Tom Cuddy

Is Flexibility Important in Cross Country Skiing?

A few years ago I took a course on motion mapping with an instructor who is involved in elite olympic athlete training in Norway.  Motionmapping tests how well we move in various directions and our ability to control our motion. The goal of the test is to identify what limitations an athlete may have in their mobility, stability, and flexibility. 

What surprised me most was the instructor’s statement that elite cross country
ski racers have the least amount of mobility out of all athletes that are tested.  The images below represent the averages of elite alpine skiers and cross country skiers (primarily from the Norwegian Olympic Training Center in Oslo) performing a task of balancing on one leg and reaching with their upper extremity in different directions on the grid (balance reach test).  The information shows us how well we combine different movement patterns using the whole body.  What you will notice is the alpine skiers have a fairly full “pie” showing mostly symmetrical reaches in all directions, whereas the cross country skiers look like a piece of the pie is missing. Furthermore, the overall magnitude of numbers are smaller for each direction. 

The left and right graphs represent the left and right leg, respectively. Each number represents the average distance that the athletes of each sport could reach in each given direction. The number on the top of the graphs refer to flexion-based movements, whereas the numbers on the bottom refer to extension-based movement.

Alpine Skiing 

Cross Country Skiing 

The “missing piece of pie” in the XC skiers represents extension (reaching backwards) and hip internal rotation. Certainly, this is not a normal motion that XC skiers engage in during day-to-day training.

This concept provokes some thought on how much motion an elite XC ski athlete needs.  When I perform movement mapping on a healthy athlete I look for symmetry between the sides and good control through the range they do have as this tends to decrease the risk of injury and overuse issues.  BUT there may be an advantage to some functional stiffness, because a big part of cross country skiing is STABILITY through movements. 

What are your thoughts? Is it important to have a full range of flexibility or should we embrace the stiffness?


Images compliments of Ola Eriksrud, Norwegian Olympic Sport Center, Oslo, Norway



Share this article

December 23, 2018
ILLIOTIBIAL BAND SYNDROME IN SKIING

October 19, 2018
OctobeR NEG

More You May Enjoy

Recovery Testing Training Planning and Execution

October 7, 2018

Intensity DistRibution of the PolaRized TRraining Method
Recovery

September 23, 2019

Nutrition For Optimal Recovery
Testing Training Planning and Execution

August 30, 2018

The Polarized Training Model